Congress did not define the term “in the national interest.” Moreover, USCIS regulations also fail to define “in the national interest.” The Administrative Appeals Office (“AAO”) has analyzed the term “national interest” and provides two relevant decisions providing some guidance in determining national interest waiver cases.
In Matter of [Name not provided], file No. EAC 92-091-50126, July 21, 1992, commonly known as Mississippi Phosphate, the AAO noted seven factors which may be considered in determining eligibility under the national interest category. These factors are as follows:
- Improving the U.S. economy;
- Improving wages and working conditions of U.S. workers;
- Improving education and training programs for U.S. children and under-qualified workers;
- Improving health care;
- Providing more affordable housing for young and/or older, poorer U.S. residents;
- Improving the environment of the U.S. and making more Productive use of natural resources; or
- A request from an interested U.S. government agency.
The other AAO decision is the New York State Department of Transportation case or “NYSDOT” which lists three additional factors to be considered in determining whether a petitioner has proven national interest eligibility.
The beneficiary must seek to work in an area of "substantial intrinsic merit";
- The beneficiary’s work must have a benefit which "will be national in scope"; and
- The beneficiary must “serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker having the same minimum qualifications.